Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Berz Ambulance Service v. Illinois Department of Mental Health

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 431 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1972-06-13 No. 64.21
Disposition: (No. 64.21-Claitnant awarded $53.00.) Award: $53.00 Agency: Illinois Department of Mental Health
Cite as: Berz Ambulance Service v. Illinois Department of Mental Health, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 431 (1972)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1970s Berz Ambulance Service v. Illinois Department of Mental Health 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 431 1972-06-13 (No. 64.21-Claitnant awarded $53.00.) /opinions/v27-p0446-1/

BERZ AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC ., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for ambulance services from an appropriation that had lapsed. The court awarded $53.00, the amount due, because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ~ ONTRACTS - ~ IJN ~ a / ~ ~ J ~ ~ J ~ \Vhen ~ r i ~ the ~ ~ appropriatioii i~)ti. froill d l i c h it claim should have bern paid has lapsed, the Court will enter ;in a\v;irtl for thc, amount due clairnant.

( No . 6480LClaiiiiant awarded $43.00,) JAMES H. BREIHAN, M.D., Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent.

Opinion filed ] me 13, 1972.

DR.JAMES H. BREIHAN, Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J . SCOTT, Attorney General; S AUL R . WEXLER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

C O N T R A C T S - ~ appropricitiori.

Z)JS~ \\'hen the appropriation f r o in \r.hich it claim should h a w been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter ;in a \ v d f o r t l r c amount due claimant.

PERLIN, C.J.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.