Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Department of Public Aid v. Illinois Department of Public Aid

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 406 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1972-04-18 No. 6111
Disposition: (No. 6111-Claimant awarded $108.32.) Award: $108.32 Agency: Department of Public Aid
Cite as: Department of Public Aid v. Illinois Department of Public Aid, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 406 (1972)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1970s Department of Public Aid v. Illinois Department of Public Aid 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 406 1972-04-18 (No. 6111-Claimant awarded $108.32.) /opinions/v27-p0421-1/

Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF DAVE NARRO, PUBLIC AID, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment from an appropriation that had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNTRAcrs-kpsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

[*407] i C O N T R A C ~ S - Zup),ropriation.

U~S~~ \\’hen the appropriation troin n+icli ;I

1 claim should h a w been paid has lapsed, the Coiirt will enter iiti a w m l for thc,

amount due claimant.

PERLIN, C.J.

( No . 6256-Claiin;int a\vardec\ $850.00.)

ROBERT T. FIELDING, M.D., Claimant, us. STATE OF Illinois,

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Respondent.

Opinion filcxl April 18, 1972.

DR. ROBERT 1’. FIELDING, Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J . SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R. WEXLEH,

Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

C O N T R A C T S - -appro)wiution.

~~~,S~~ \Vhen the appropriation frolll \vliicli ;I

claim should have brrn paid has lapseed. thr Corirt will enter an a w i r t l for the,

amount due claiinnnt.

PERLIN, C.J.

I ( No . 6354-Cl;ii1nant awarded $25.66.)

SKELLY OIL COMPANY, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS,

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

Opinion filed April 18, 1972.

SKELLY OIL C OMPANY, Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E.

WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

I

I

CONTRACTS-~U~ISC~up))ropriufion. \\’hen the ~i~)~)ro~)ri~itioll

frotll \\.hidl ;I

claim should h a w hem pait1 h;is lapstd. thr Court ill mtcr iui a \ v d for t l ~ c .

amount due claiin;int.

PERLIN, C.J.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.