Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Lankton v. State of Illinois

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1972-02-17 No. 6283
Disposition: (No. 6283-Claimant a\varded 81,062.61 ) Award: $81,062.61 Agency: Departments of Public Works and Buildings and Mental Health
Cite as: Lankton v. State of Illinois, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 (1972)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1970s Lankton v. State of Illinois 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 1972-02-17 (No. 6283-Claimant a\varded 81,062.61 ) /opinions/v27-p0348-3/

LANKTON, ZIEGELE, TERRY AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENTS OF PUBLIC WORKS AND BUILDINGS and MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent. Opinion f i l d Fehrtiuril 17, 1972 LANKTON,ZIEGELE, TERRY AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Claim-

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services under a contract, but the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed. The Court awarded the amount due, $81,062.61, because when an appropriation lapses, the court enters an award for the amount due.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed uppropridon \\'hen the approlmation from \vhich a claim should have been paid has Iapcd. the Court \vi11 enter an a\vard for thr amount due claimant.

The official report prints no opinion text for this claim beyond the heading, headnote, and judge line shown above. The Court's disposition is stated in the heading. See the PDF for the page as printed.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.