Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Thefimo-Fax Sales v. Illinois Department of Mental Health, Respondent. Opinion Fired May 11, 1971

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 216 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1971-05-11 No. 5735
Disposition: (No. 5735-Claimant awarded $s30.00.) Award: $530.00 Agency: Illinois Department of Mental Health
Cite as: Thefimo-Fax Sales v. Illinois Department of Mental Health, Respondent. Opinion Fired May 11, 1971, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 216 (1971)
Lapsed Appropriation 27 awarded 1970s Thefimo-Fax Sales v. Illinois Department of Mental Health, Respondent. Opinion Fired May 11, 1971 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 216 1971-05-11 (No. 5735-Claimant awarded $s30.00.) /opinions/v27-p0230-2/

THEFIMO-FAX SALES, INC., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent. Opinion fired May 11, 1971.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment for goods or services from an appropriation that had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due, $30.00, because the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNmcrs-Zupsed appropriution. \Vhen the appropriation from \vhich a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

( So . 5741-Claimant awarded $125.00.)

C. E. WINDSOR,M.D., Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DIVISION OF

\'OCATIONAL R EHABILITATION, Respondent.

[*217] O l J i t i i o t if i / d .\fur/ I I . 1971.

\lcChww, Attorne). for Claim

\\.Isi;xi.As. SIIAIKEWITZ, illlt.

\ \ . i I , i , i , . n i J . SCOTT. '8ttorncj. General; \\'ILLIAXI E. \ \ ' ( > l ) l x:\~ ssistan . t A ttorne!, C;cneral, for Respondent.

CoNTRAcTs-lapsed appropriation. \Vhen the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

PERLIN,C.J.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.