Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Licata Moving and Storage Company v. Illinois Department of Public Aid

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1971-04-27 No. 5869
Disposition: (No. 5869-Claimant awarded $160.00.) Award: $114.00 Agency: Department of Public Aid
Cite as: Licata Moving and Storage Company v. Illinois Department of Public Aid, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 (1971)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1970s Licata Moving and Storage Company v. Illinois Department of Public Aid 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 1971-04-27 (No. 5869-Claimant awarded $160.00.) /opinions/v27-p0198-2/

LICATA MOVING AND STORAGE COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered, but the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. 1% \.
  2. CONTRACTS -appropriation. ~~S~~ When the appropriation froin which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Conrt will enter an award for thc, amount due claimant.

( No . 5871-Claimant awarded $114.00.) LICATA MOVING AND STORAGE COMPANY, Claimant, vs. STATE OF

ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID, Respondent.

Opinion filed April 27, 1971.

LICATA MOVING AND STORAGE COMPANY, Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R. WEXLER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Com A c T s - h ) w d appropriation. M/ hen the appropriation froin which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for tlw amount due clainiant.

HOLDERMAN, J.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.