SERVICE COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, LIVINGSTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND BUILDINGS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered under a contract, but the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

CoNTRAcrs-~apsed appropriation. When the appropriation f r o m which il

LIVINGSTON SERVICE COMPANY, Claimant, pro se. WILLIAM J . SCOTT, Attorney General; LEE D. MARTIN, Assistant Attorney General, far Respondent. CoNTRAcrs-~apsed appropriation. When the appropriation f r o m which il claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant. DOVE, J .

LIVINGSTON

SERVICE COMPANY, Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J . SCOTT, Attorney General; LEE D. MARTIN, Assistant Attorney General, far Respondent.

CoNTRAcrs-~apsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which il claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

DOVE, J .