Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Beatrice Markley v. State of Illinois

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 37 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1969-12-18 No. 5355
Disposition: (No. 5355-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) Award: $3,000.00 Agency: Illinois State Fairgrounds
Cite as: Beatrice Markley v. State of Illinois, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 37 (1969)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1960s Beatrice Markley v. State of Illinois 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 37 1969-12-18 (No. 5355-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) /opinions/v27-p0051-1/

BEATRICE MARKLEY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $20,000 for injuries when an iron fence at the Illinois State Fair fell on her foot. The court found the State failed to maintain the area safely and awarded $3,000.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. STATE PARKS, FAIR GROUNDS, MEMORIAISAND INSTITUTIONS - c O f l ~ ~ i ~ i 0 f Of premises. Respondent owed a paying patron at state fair a duty to maintain thc area in a reasonably safe condition.

This is a claim for the sum of $20,000.00as damages for injuries sustained by claimant when an iron fence surrounding the swine pen on the Illinois State Fairgrounds fell on claimant's right foot.

Beatrice Markley, the claimant, testified that she was a paying patron at the Illinois State Fair, and that, while she was in the swine shed at the Fair, one of the swine bumped [*38] against an iron fence causing it to be toppled over onto her right foot. Claimant further testified that she was taken to St. John’s Hospital in Springfield, Illinois, where x-rays of her right foot were taken; that she received treatment in the hospital, and remained there for three days. She developed an infection in her foot, and Dr. Bom, her physician, placed her in the Hinsdale Sanitarium and Hospital, Hinsdale, 11- linois, where she remained for ten days. The evidence indicates that claimant was absent from her job for a period of eight weeks, and incurred medical expenses of $761.57.

It was the duty of respondent to maintain the swine exhibit area in a reasonably safe condition. As the evidence points out, respondent failed to exercise this duty of care.

An iron fence such as the one surrounding the swine pen would not have been knocked over had it been in a repaired and safe condition.

From the transcript of the evidence it may be seen that claimant was acting with due care for her own safety at the time of the accident.

This Court accordingly awards claimant the sum of $3,000.oo.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.