Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center v. Nois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 442 Illinois Court of Claims Filed April 17, 1969. No. 5501
Disposition: (No. 5501-Claimant awarded $1,443.75.) Award: $1,443.75 Agency: Department of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Welfare
Cite as: Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center v. Nois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 442 (1969)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center v. Nois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 442 April 17, 1969. (No. 5501-Claimant awarded $1,443.75.) /opinions/v26-p0483-1/

MICHAEL REESEHOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, An Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation, Claimant, ‘v. STATE OF ILLI- NOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $1,443.75 for medical services rendered to wards of the Department, which went unpaid due to lapse of appropriation. The court awarded the amount, finding the contract properly entered, services performed, and funds available at contract time.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc. v. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed, proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available a t the time said contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, an award will be made.

PERLIN,

Claimant seeks recovery for medical services rendered to one Norman Sailor, a ward of the Division of Child Welfare, Department of Children and Family Services of the State of Illinois, in the amount of $366.50; and for medical services rendered in May and June, 1966 to one Dallas Kozfkay, also a ward of the Department, in the amount of $1,077.25. The reason for nonpayment is the lapse of the biennial appropriation.

The parties have stipulated that the amount of $1,443.75 is lawfully due to claimant.

Where a contract with the State has been (1)properly entered into ; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract ; ( 3 ) proper charges made therefor; and, (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contract was entered into, this Court will enter an award for the amount due. Gilbert-Hodgmafi, Inc., A Corporation, vs. State of Illimois, 24 C.C.R. 509. It appears that all the requirements have been met in the instant case.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $1,443.75.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.