Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

The Capital City Paper Company v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 324 Illinois Court of Claims Filed February 24, 1969 No. 5408
Disposition: (No.- 5408-Claimant awarded $549.50.) Award: $549.50
Cite as: The Capital City Paper Company v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 324 (1969)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s The Capital City Paper Company v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 324 February 24, 1969 (No.- 5408-Claimant awarded $549.50.) /opinions/v26-p0365-1/

THE CAPITAL CITY PAPER COMPANY, An Illinois Corpora- tion, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for materials furnished to state departments. The court awarded $549.50 based on a stipulation reducing the claim, finding the claim was a lapsed appropriation and the requirements for an award were met.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-kqISed appropriation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed, proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available a t the time the contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant, The Capital City Paper Company, an Illinois Corporation, filed its complaint against respondent for the sum of $626.73 for materials furnished to various departments of government of the State of Illinois.

Thereafter, a stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent as follows:

“The report of the office of the Secretary of State, dated December 9, 1968, (a copy of which is attached hereto, marked exhibit A, and, by this reference, incorporated herein and made a part hereof) shall be admitted into evidence in this proceeding without objection by either party.

“No other oral or written evidence will be introduced by either party.

[*325] “The Commissioner to which this case has been assigned and the Court may make and file their reports, recommendations, orders and decisions based upon the pleadings heretofore filea, and the evidence herein stipulated.

“It is agreed between the parties hereto that claimant’s claim will be reduced from the amount of $626.73 to $549.50, pursuant to the evidence presented by the departmental report hereto attached and marked exhibit A.

“Neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum of $549.50.

“Neither party desires to file briefs in this proceeding.

“Both parties waive notice of any hearing, and agree that the aforesaid order may be entered without either party being present.”

This is a matter of a lapsed appropriation, and this Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1) properly entered into; (2) service is satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor ; (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, ( 5 ) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due.

Claimant, The Capital City Paper Company, an Illinois Corporation, is, therefore, awarded the sum of $549.50.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.