Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

The Ray Graham Rehabilitation Center v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 275 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-12-17 No. 5508
Disposition: (No. 5508-Claimant awarded $280.00.) Award: $280.00 Agency: Division of Vocational Rehabilitation
Cite as: The Ray Graham Rehabilitation Center v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 275 (1968)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s The Ray Graham Rehabilitation Center v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 275 1968-12-17 (No. 5508-Claimant awarded $280.00.) /opinions/v26-p0316-1/

THE RAY GRAHAM REHABEJTATIONCENTER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $280.00 for services rendered to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation; payment was not made before the biennium appropriation closed due to billing delay. The court found the contract was properly entered, services performed, charges proper, and funds available, and awarded the amount.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc. vs. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed, proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available at the time said contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant seeks payment of $280.00 for services rendered to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation from November 21, 1966 through January 13, 1967. Both parties have stipulated that, as a result of delay in billing, payment was not made prior to the closing of the Biennium Appropriation, and that the requested sum is lawfully due the claimant.

Where a contract with the State has been (1)properly entered into ; ( 2 ) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract ; ( 3 ) proper charges made therefor ; and, (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contract was entered into, this Court will enter an award for the amount due. Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc. vs. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509. It appears that all the requirements have been met in the instant case.

Claimant, Ray Graham Rehabilitation Center, is hereby awarded the sum of $280.00.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.