Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Mobil Oil Corporation v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 203 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-05-14 No. 6466
Disposition: (No. 6466-Claimant awarded $134.19.) Award: $134.19 Agency: Department of Conservation
Cite as: Mobil Oil Corporation v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 203 (1968)
Legacy General 26 awarded 1960s Mobil Oil Corporation v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 203 1968-05-14 (No. 6466-Claimant awarded $134.19.) /opinions/v26-p0244-1/

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A New York Corporation, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $134.19 for materials furnished to the Department of Conservation. The court found the contract properly entered, services performed, funds available, and appropriation lapsed, and awarded the amount.

Claim type: Contract

Cases cited: St. Mary's Hospital, Decatur, of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, an Illinois Corporation, vs. State of Illinois, Case No. 5261, opinion filed February 24, 1966

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed app,prophation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed, proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available at the time said contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, a n s,ward will be made.

Claimant, Mobil Oil Corporation, a New York Corporation, filed its complaint in the Court of Claims on January 12, 1968, in which it seeks the sum of $134.19 for materials furnished the Department of Conservation.

A Departmental Report was filed, whicb stated in part:

“I wish to certify at this time that invoice No. 12577, dated June 17, 1967, in the amount of $134.19 was never p.aid by this Department, due to the failure of Mobil Oil Corporation to submit a billing in time to be processed out of 74th biennial funds.”

Subsequently a written stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent, as follows:

“The report of the Department of Conservation, dated January 19, 1968, ( a copy of which is attached hereto, marked exhibit “A” and, by this reference, incorporated herein and made apart hereof) shall be admitted into evidence in this proceeding without objection by either party.

“No other oral or written evidence will be introduced by either party.

“The Commissioner to which this case has been assigned and the Court may make and file their reports, recommendations, orders and decisions based upon the pleadings heretofore filed, and the evidence herein stipulated.

“Neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum of $134.19.

“Neither party desires to file briefs in this proceeding.

“Both parties waive notice of any hearing and agree that the aforesaid order may be entered without either party being present.”

[*205] This Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1) properly entered into; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials, furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, (5) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due. St. Mary's Hospital, Decatzlr, of the Hospital Sisters of Bhe Third Order of St. Francis, an Illinois Corporatiow, vs. State of Illinois, Case No. 5261, opinion filed February 24,1966. It appears that all qualifications for an award have been met in the instant case.

Claimant, Mobil Oil Corporation, a New York Corporation, is, therefore, hereby awarded the sum of $134.19.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.