Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Merchant Service Co-Op v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 200 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-05-14 No. 6437
Disposition: (No. 6437-Claimant awarded $6034.) Award: $60.94 Agency: Secretary of State, Drivers License Division
Cite as: Merchant Service Co-Op v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 200 (1968)
Legacy General 26 awarded 1960s Merchant Service Co-Op v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 200 1968-05-14 (No. 6437-Claimant awarded $6034.) /opinions/v26-p0241-1/

MERCHANT SERVICE CO-OP, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $60.94 for materials furnished to the Secretary of State, Drivers License Division. The court awarded the amount because the contract was properly entered into, services were performed, charges were proper, funds were available when the contract was made, and the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: St. Mary's Hospital, Decatur, of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, an Illinois Corporation, vs. State of Illinois, Case No. 5261, opinion filed February 24, 1966

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-kZp8ed appropriation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed, proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available at the time said contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant, Merchant Service Co-op, filed its complaint in the Court of Claims on November 30, 1967 in which it seeks the sum of $60.94 for materials furnished the Secretary of State, Drivers License Division.

A Departmental Report was filed, which stated in part: “Our records indicate that parts were received and installed. The invoice was not submitted until after the appropriation for the 74th biennium had lapsed.”

Subsequently a written stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent, which reads as follows:

“The report of the Secretary of State (Drivers License Division) dated January 3, 1968, (a copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit “A”, and, by this reference, incorporated herein, and made a part hereof) shall be admitted into evidence in this proceeding without objection by either party.

“No other oral or written evidence will be introduced by either party.

“The Commissioner to which this case has been ,assigned and the Court may make and file their reports,

recommendations, orders and decisions based upon the [*202] pleadings heretofore filed, and the evidence herein stipulated.

“Neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum of $60.94.

“Neither party desires to file briefs in this proceeding.

“Both parties waive notice of any hearing, and agree that the aforesaid order may be entered. without either party being present.”

This Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1) properly entered into; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) prope-r charges made therefor; (4)adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, ( 5 ) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due. S t . Mary’s Hospital, Decaiur, of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, an Illinois Corporatiou, vs. State of Illinois, Case No. 5261, opinion filed February 24,1966. It appears that all qualifications for an award have been met in the instant case.

Claimant, Merchant Service Co-op, is, therefore, hereby awarded the sum of $60.94.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.