Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Toledo v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 51 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1967-01-10 No. 5353
Disposition: (No. 5353-Claimant awarded $180.00.) Award: $180.00 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways
Cite as: Toledo v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 51 (1967)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s Toledo v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 51 1967-01-10 (No. 5353-Claimant awarded $180.00.) /opinions/v26-p0092-1/

TOLEDO,PEORIA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Claim- ant, ‘v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $180.00 in rent for premises occupied by the Department of Public Works and Buildings, which admitted the debt but noted the appropriation had lapsed. The court awarded the amount because the appropriation had lapsed and there were unobligated balances.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

Claimant seeks to recover the sum of $180.00 as rent for certain premises occupied by the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways, of the State of Illinois.

A Departmental Report has been filed admitting that claimant is entitled to the sum of $180.00 as rent for certain premises for the years ending June 30,1962, June 30,1963, June 30,1964 and June 30,1965. The Departmental Report states that the invoices were received by the Division of Highways, but that said invoices were not paid; that the-fund appropriated for such payments had lapsed, and that there were unobligated balances in said funds sufficient to pay for the rental of said premises owned by claimant.

Subsequently a stipulation was entered into by and between claimant and respondent admitting that claimant is entitled to the amount of $180.00, and that said amount is owed by the respondent herein.

This Court has held that, when the appropriation for the biennium from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, it will enter an order for the amount due claimant.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $180.00.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.