Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

A. S. Moe v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 38 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1967-01-10 No. 5286
Disposition: (No. 5286-Claimant awarded $25.00.) Award: $25.00 Agency: Illinois Department of Public Aid
Cite as: A. S. Moe v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 38 (1967)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s A. S. Moe v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 38 1967-01-10 (No. 5286-Claimant awarded $25.00.) /opinions/v26-p0079-1/

A. S. MOE, Claimant, 8s. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for physician's services rendered to Cora Ann Bruyn, but payment was refused because the appropriation for the Illinois Department of Public Aid had lapsed. The court awarded $25.00, finding that the only reason for nonpayment was the lapse of the appropriation.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. JvIbmAM G. CLARK, Attorney General; LEE D. MAR- CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. Where evidence disclosed that

CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. Where evidence disclosed that the only reason claim was not paid was because the appropriation lapsed prior to the time a statement was presented, an award will be made.

c. J.

I’ERLIN,

Claimant seeks to recover payment from respondent based on a Physician’s Statement of Services Rendered on behalf of one Cora Ann Bruyn. Claimant alleges that he has made demand for such payment, but was refused on the grounds that the funds appropriated for the Illinois Department of Public Aid had lapsed.

I! Departmental Report submitted to the Attorney General states that “Claimant is justly- entitled to the payment of $25.00. ” A stipulation filed herein states that “Neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum of $25.00. ” [*39]

It appears that the sole reason for nonpayment of the statement rendered was the lapse of the appropriation.

Claimant, A. S. Moe, is, therefore, hereby awarded the sum of $25.00.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.