Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Campus Book Store v. Fillinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 373 Illinois Court of Claims Filed November 17, 1065 No. 5342
Disposition: (No. 534Mlaimant awarded $142.42.) Award: $142.42 Agency: Division of Vocational Rehabilitation
Cite as: Campus Book Store v. Fillinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 373 (1065)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Campus Book Store v. Fillinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 373 November 17, 1065 (No. 534Mlaimant awarded $142.42.) /opinions/v25-p0406-1/

CAMPUS BOOK STORE, INC., Claimant, v. STATE O FILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $142.42 for books furnished to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. The court awarded the amount because the appropriation for the biennium had lapsed, following its precedent.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. Comwzrs-lapsed uppropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

Claimant seeks to recover the sum of $142.42 for certain books furnished by claimant to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Subsequently a stipulation was entered into by and between claimant and respondent establishing that the invoices were not paid on the grounds that the -hnds appropriated for such payments had lapsed. The stipulation [*374] further provides that the amount of $142.42 is owed by re- ~ spondent to claimant.

This Court has held that, when the appropriation for the biennium from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, it will enter an order for the amount due claimant.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $142.42.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.