Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Decatur and Macon County Hospital Association v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 365 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1966-08-17 No. 5318
Disposition: (No. 5318-Claimant awarded $2,356.97.) Award: $2,356.97 Agency: Illinois Department of Public Aid
Cite as: Decatur and Macon County Hospital Association v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 365 (1966)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Decatur and Macon County Hospital Association v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 365 1966-08-17 (No. 5318-Claimant awarded $2,356.97.) /opinions/v25-p0398-1/

DECATUR AND MACON COUNTY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, ACORPO- RATION, Claimant, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for hospital services rendered to five recipients under the Assistance to the Medically Indigent Aged program, but the appropriation had lapsed. The court found the charges reasonable and awarded $2,356.97.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. DECATUR AND MACON COUNTY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, A CORPO- CONTRACTS-hpSc?d appropriation. When the appropriation from PRACTICE AND PRocEDum-stipulation in lieu of record. Court will

Opinion filed August 17, 1966.

[*1] I

!

I

I

f !

LE FORGEE, SAMUELS, MILLER, SCHROEDER

AND JACKSON, I

i Attorneys for Claimant.

WILLIAM G. CLARX, Attorney General; LEE D. MARTIN, i Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

CONTRACTS-hpSc?d appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

PRACTICE AND PRocEDum-stipulation in lieu of record. Court will

I

I

consider case on Departmental Report where it is stipulated by the parties I to constitute the record in the case.

J. PEZMAN, Claimant, Decatur and Macon County Hospital Association, A Corporation, presented its statements to the De- I partment of Public Aid for services, which were rendered ! to the following individuals on the dates set forth thereafter: I Margaret Taylor, 829 N. Illinois, Decatur, Illinois Ruby Jane Van Norsdale, 451 Longview, Decatur,

Illinois

5/2/65-6/25/65 4/21/65-5/ 1/65

I

Margaret T. McDaniel, 854 W. King, Decatur, !

Illinois 6/29/65-6/30/65

Fern Gertrude McDaniel, R.R. No. 1, Decatur, I

Illinois 6/25/65-6/30/65 I

I

Charles Mount, 422 West Eldorado, Decatur, Illinois 4/28/65

I

The Department of Public Aid had determined that the aforementioned recipients were eligible to receive aid I

I

under its program of Assistance to the Medically Indigent

I

Aged, but the Department denied the claims for the services

I

rendered on the basis that the claims were for services rendered prior to July 1, 1965, and that the appropriation for that biennium had lapsed. On June 6, 1966, claimant filed its complaint in the Court of Claims seeking to recover the sum of $2,356.97 for hospital services rendered to the I five individual recipients heretofore mentioned.

A Departmental Report was filed in the matter as ex- i hibit “A,” and, pursuant to stipulation, was admitted into I evidence. The Departmental Report consists of a letter from ~

I

[*367] Harold 0. Swank, Director of the Department of Public Aid, stating in effect that claimant is justly entitled to the amount claimed.

Pursuant to the stipulation entered into on behalf of the Decatur and Macon County Hospital Association, by its attorneys, and the State of Illinois, by the Attorney General, the Departmental Report was admitted into evidence as the sole and only evidence in this cause. From this we find that the reasonable and equitable charges for services rendered by claimant to Margaret Taylor, Ruby Jane Van Norsdale, Margaret T. McDaniel, Fern Gertrude McDaniel, and Charles Mount amounted to $2,356.97. We find that the appropriation for payment of the same had lapsed, and that claimant is justly entitled thereto.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $2,356.97.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.