Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Fairbury-Forrest Clinic v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 340 Illinois Court of Claims Filed july 14, 1966 No. 5302
Disposition: (No. 5302-Claimant awarded $148.15.) Award: $148.15 Agency: Department of Children and Family Services
Cite as: Fairbury-Forrest Clinic v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 340 (1966)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Fairbury-Forrest Clinic v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 340 july 14, 1966 (No. 5302-Claimant awarded $148.15.) /opinions/v25-p0373-1/

FAIRBURY-FORREST CLINIC, Claimant, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered to Rodney Bailey. The court awarded the amount because the only reason for nonpayment was that the appropriation for the 73rd biennium had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNmcTs-kzpsed appropriation. Where evidence disclosed that the only reason claim was not paid was because the appropriation lapsed prior to the time a statement was presented, an award will be made.

Fairbury-Forrest Clinic, claimant, presented its statement to the Department of Children and Family Services for services rendered one Rodney Bailey in the amount of $148.15.

Claimant had prepared and filed with the Department of Children and Family Services a statement for said amount, but payment of said claim was refused on the grounds that funds appropriated for the Department of Children and Family Services for such payments had lapsed.

A Departmental Report was filed, which stated that the services were rendered, and that claimant was entitled to payment of the above amount.

Subsequently a stipulation was entered into between claimant and the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, which found that claimant was entitled to the sum of $148.15for services so rendered.

It appears that the sole reason for not paying claimant was that the appropriation for the 73rd biennium had lapsed.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $148.15.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.