Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Green v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 325 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1966-05-10 No. 5282
Disposition: (No. 5282-Claimant awarded $100.00.) Award: $100.00 Agency: Department of Public Aid of St. Clair County
Cite as: Green v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 325 (1966)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Green v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 325 1966-05-10 (No. 5282-Claimant awarded $100.00.) /opinions/v25-p0358-1/

KENNETH 0. GREEN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $350 for cataract surgery; the Department's fee schedule allowed only $100, and payment was refused because the appropriation had lapsed. The court awarded $100 based on a stipulation.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ComFums-kzpsed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

Kenneth 0. Green, claimant, presented his statement in the amount of $350.00. to the Department of Public Aid of St. Clair County for cataract surgery on the right eye of R. Carl Koch.

Claimant had prepared and filed with the Department of Public Aid a statement for said amount, but payment of the claim was refused on the grounds that funds appropriated for the Department of Public Aid for such payments had Iapsed.

A Departmental Report was filed, which states as follows :

“The amount claimed of $350.00 is not according to our fee schedule, as the maximum allowable by the Department is $100.00, and Dr. Green is aware of this maximum. The claim in the amount of $100.00 is a just and valid claim due from the Department.”

Subsequently a stipulation was entered into between claimant and the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, which found that claimant should be paid the sum of $100.00 for the services rendered to the said R. Carl Koch.

It appears that the sole reason for not paying claimant was that the appropriation for the 73rd biennium had lapsed.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $100.00.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.