Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Medical Surgical Clinic v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 321 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1966-05-10 No. 5278
Disposition: (No. 5278-Claimant awarded $139.50.) Award: $139.50 Agency: Illinois Department of Public Aid
Cite as: Medical Surgical Clinic v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 321 (1966)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Medical Surgical Clinic v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 321 1966-05-10 (No. 5278-Claimant awarded $139.50.) /opinions/v25-p0354-1/

MEDICAL SURGICAL CLINIC, Claimant, OS. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment of $139.50 for medical services rendered to R. W. Curtis, which the Illinois Department of Public Aid refused due to lapsed appropriation. The court awarded the full amount, finding the claim just and valid.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNTucrs-bpsed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

Medical Surgical Clinic, claimant, presented its state

ment in the amount of $139.50 to the Illinois Department

of Public Aid for services rendered to R. W. Curtis.

[*322] Claimant had prepared and filed with the Illinois Department of Public Aid a voucher for services rendered. Payment was refused, however, for the reason that there were no funds available, as the appropriation for the 73rd biennium had lapsed.

A Departmental Report was filed, which stated that the said Department had not paid the sum of $139.50; and, further, that the claim was just and valid, and claimant was entitled to payment.

Subsequently a stipulation was entered into between claimant and the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, which found that claimant was entitled to be reimbursed for services rendered the patient, R. W. Curtis, in the amount of $139.50.

It appears that the sole reason for not paying claimant was that the appropriation for the 73rd biennium had lapsed.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $139.50.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.