Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Axel Gilbert Anderson v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 198 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1965-05-11 No. 5207
Disposition: (No. 5207-Claimant awarded $7,868.43. ) Award: $7,868.43 Agency: Department of Conservation
Cite as: Axel Gilbert Anderson v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 198 (1965)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Axel Gilbert Anderson v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 198 1965-05-11 (No. 5207-Claimant awarded $7,868.43. ) /opinions/v25-p0231-1/

AXEL GILBERT ANDERSON, Claimant, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought back pay for unlawful discharge from February 14, 1961 to June 30, 1963. The court awarded $7,868.43 after deducting outside earnings of $3,501.57 from the gross salary of $11,370.00, but denied court costs.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

Statutes cited: Sec. 63-b-111, Chap. 127, 1963 Ill. Rev. Stats.

Cases cited: Schneider vs. State of Illinois, 22 C.C.R. 453; Poynter vs. State of Illinois, 21 C.C.R. 393

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CIVIL SERVICE Am-salary for period of unlawful discharge. Where claimant was unlawfully discharged, he may seek back pay for the period of illegal removal, less credit to the State for supplemental earnings during said period of time.
  2. SAME-determination of damages by court of claims. Court of Claims is not barred from independently determining claimant’s damages, both with respect to mitigation of damages and set-offs of outside earnings during period of unlawful dismissal.
  3. SmE-ayment of court costs expended in another court. There is no authority in the Court of Claims Act for the payment of court costs expended in another court by a cIaimant.

Claimant is seeking an award for $11,370.00 for back salary as a Conservation Inspector I in the Department of Conservation of Illinois, Law Enforcement Division, from February 14, 1961, on which date he was unlawfully discharged, to June 30, 1963, plus court costs incurred by claimant in the amount of $110.30.

On February 1,1961, William T. Lodge, Director of the Department of Conservation of Illinois, submitted to Maude Myers, Director of the Department of Personnel of Illinois, a written request for the separation of claimant from his employment as a Conservation Inspector I in the Department of Conservation of Illinois, Law Enforcement Division.

Thereafter, claimant was laid off from his position on February 14, 1961.

Subsequently, claimant filed a complaint for mandamus in the Circuit Court of Sangamon County, Illinois, and, on [*199] March 9, 1964, a decree was entered directing William T. Lodge and Maude Myers to reinstate claimant to his position and title of Conservation Inspector I as of February 14, 1961.

From July 1, 1963 to the date of claimant’s reinstatement, the court directed the Auditor of the State of Illinois to issue salary warrants and the Treasurer of the State of Illinois to pay such warrants in the amount of claimant’s full salary and wages for such period.

From February 14, 1961 to June 30, 1963, for which period funds had lapsed, the Circuit Court order provided as follows: “ ( e ) That this Court orders and declares the plaintiff, Axel Gilbert Anderson, is entitled to and has a right to the full salary and wages of his said position as Conservation Inspector I in the Department of Conservation of Illinois from February 14, 1961, to June 30, 1963.”

On August 13,1964, the Appellate Court for the Fourth District dismissed respondent’s appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon County and issued its mandate to the Circuit Clerk of Sangamon County.

The State of Illinois has paid claimant in the amount of $5,630.32, his full salary and wages for the period from July 1, 1963 to August 18, 1964, the date of his reinstatement.

Because of the lapse of appropriations, claimant has filed his complaint in this Court to recover his salary and wages for the period of February 14, 1961, through June 30, 1963.

In prosecuting his mandamus action in the Circuit Court, and in defending the State’s appeal in the Appellate Court, claimant incurred court costs in the amount of $110.30.

The mandate of the Appellate Court reads in part as follows: [*200] “And it is further considered by the Court that the said appellee recover of and from the said appellants costs by him in this behalf expended the same to be collected in due course of law.”

There are two issues in this case: (1) Respondent admits that claimant’s gross wages for the period of February 14, 1961, through June 30, 1963, are in the amount of $11,370.00, but denies that claimant is entitled to an award for the full amount; ( 2 ) Respondent denies that claimant is entitled to an award for his Circuit and Appellate Court costs.

It was stipulated by the parties that claimant’s outside earnings for the years in question were as follows: 1961 .......................... .$ 370.00 1962 ........................... 2,263.55 1963 (January 1, 1963, to June 30, 1963, inc. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868.02 Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$3,501.57 This Court is of the opinion that neither the language of Sec. 63-b-111, Chap. 127, 1963 Ill. Rev. Stats., nor the order of the Circuit Court of Sangamon County bars this Court from independently determining claimant’s damages -both with respect to mitigation of damages (see Schneider vs. State of Illinois, 22 C.C.R. 453), and set-offs of outside earnings during the period of unlawful dismissal (see Poynter vs. State of Illinois, 21 C.C.R. 393).

There is no authority in the Court of Claims Act for the payment of court costs expended in another court by a claimant. This part of the claim is denied.

Claimant, Axel Gilbert Anderson, may seek back pay for the period from February 14, 1961, to June 30, 1963, in the amount of $11,370.00, less credit to the State for supplemental earnings during said period of time in the amount [*201] i 201 I of $3,501.57, which figure has been stipulated between the attorney for claimant and the Attorney General, leaving a net amount of $7,868.43.

I

Claimant is, therefore, awarded the sum of $7,868.43.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.