Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. State of Illinois

23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 203 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1960-01-12 No. 4837
Disposition: (No. 4837-Claimant awarded $806.38.) Award: $806.38
Cite as: Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. State of Illinois, 23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 203 (1960)
Legacy General 23 awarded 1960s Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. State of Illinois 23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 203 1960-01-12 (No. 4837-Claimant awarded $806.38.) /opinions/v23-p0232-1/

HAWKEYE-SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent. Opinion f L d January 12, 1960.

Case summary

Claimant sought a refund of $806.38 in overpaid taxes on net receipts, alleging it failed to claim a deduction for fire department taxes paid in 1956. The court found the Departmental Report substantiated the claim and awarded the full amount.

Claim type: Tax Refund

Statutes cited: Section 414 of the Illinois Insurance Code

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. TAXES AND FINEs-Overfiayment of insurance taxes. Evidence showed claimant entitled to recover overpayment pursuant to Section 414 of the Insurance Code.

On August 21, 1958, claimant filed a complaint alleging that taxes on the net receipts of its agencies, as provided in Section 414 of the Illinois Insurance Code, in the amount of $806.38 had been mistakenly overpaid, in that claimant failed to claim a deduction in said amount for fire department taxes paid in 1956.

The Departmental Report substantiates the allegations of the complaint, and it appears as though there is no doubt but what claimant is entitled to such credits.

An award is, therefore, made to claimant in the amount of $806.38.

Official volume 23 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: September 1, 1958–June 30, 1960)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.