Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Stanley Brook and Norman Rubin v. State of Illinois

22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 541 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1957-04-26 No. 4734
Disposition: (No. 4734-Claimants awarded $3,0?6.20.) Award: $306.20
Cite as: Stanley Brook and Norman Rubin v. State of Illinois, 22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 541 (1957)
Legacy General 22 awarded 1950s Stanley Brook and Norman Rubin v. State of Illinois 22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 541 1957-04-26 (No. 4734-Claimants awarded $3,0?6.20.) /opinions/v22-p0575-1/

STANLEY BROOK AND NORMAN RUBIN,d/b/a ABBOT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent. Opinion fled April 26, 1957. IRVING S. BERMAN

Case summary

Claimants sought payment of the unpaid balance under a contract for repairs to state armories. The court awarded $3,036.20 because the work was satisfactorily performed and the appropriation had lapsed before final payment.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-1UpSed appropriations. Where evidence showed that a t the time the contract was payable there were sufficient funds on hand to pay the claim, an award will be made.

The complaint in this case was predicated upon a written contract No. 67976, dated June 11, 1953, with respondent for certain repairs and alterations to the State of Illinois Armory Buildings at Delavan, Decatur and Peoria, Illinois. The total contract for labor and material [*542] was $16,558.00. There was paid thereon $13,511.80, leaving a balance unpaid of $3,036.20.

A stipulation was entered into by the parties, wherein briefs and arguments were waived, and an order has been entered by this Court allowing the waiver of briefs and arguments.

No answer having been filed by respondent, a general traverse of all the allegations in the complaint is considered under the rules of this Court.

The record consists of the complaint and Departmental Reports.

The evidence was heard by Commissioner Immenhausen, and it was found by him that an award in the amount of $3,036.20 should be made. This is a case where funds were appropriated to do the work called for by the contract, and were available at the time the contract mas entered into. Subsequent thereto, the appropriation lapsed before final payment had been made.

From an examination of the testimony and exhibits, including the Departmental Reports, there is no question but that the work was satisfactorily performed, inspected and approved, that the charges made were fair and reasonable, and that claimants had no alternative but to file the complaint to recover the balance due because of the lapse of the appropriation.

In previous opinions we have discussed similar situations, and have made awards where work had been satisfactorily performed in accordance with contracts entered into with the State of Illinois, and all that remained was the payment of the balance due under contracts of this nature.

[*543] It is, therefore, the order of this Court that an award be made to claimants for the unpaid balance in the sum of $3,036.20.

Official volume 22 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: May 1, 1954–August 31, 1958)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.