Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Thetexas Company v. Illinois

22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19 Illinois Court of Claims Filed June 25, 1954 No. 4601
Disposition: (No. 4601-Claimant awarded $172.42.) Award: $172.42 Agency: Department of Finance, Division of Purchases and Supplies
Cite as: Thetexas Company v. Illinois, 22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19 (1954)
Lapsed Appropriation 22 awarded 1950s Thetexas Company v. Illinois 22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19 June 25, 1954 (No. 4601-Claimant awarded $172.42.) /opinions/v22-p0053-1/

THETEXAS COMPANY, ADELAWARE CORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATEOF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The Texas Company claimed $172.42 for goods provided under a purchase order. The court allowed the claim based on a report verifying the purchase order.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. TIERNAN,
  2. PURCHASES-lapsed appropriation. Evidence sustained an award where appropriation had lapsed.

The complaint in this cause was filed on January 25, 1954, and attached to it was a purchase order, which was identified as claimant’s exhibit A. A bill of particulars and an order of the Court waiving the filing of brief and argument in said cause have also been filed.

On March 12, 1954, a Report of the Division of Highways made by Earl McIC Guy, Engineer of Claims, verifying claimant’s exhibit A as a true and correct copy of purchase order No. F-98331 issued to The Texas Company by the State of Illinois, Department of Finance, Division of Purchases and Supplies, was filed.

It is, therefore, the order of this Court that the claim in the amount of $172.42 be, and is hereby allowed.

Official volume 22 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: May 1, 1954–August 31, 1958)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.