Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Thomas Kehoe v. State of Illinois

20 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1951-05-08 No. 4352
Disposition: (No. 4352-Claimant awarded $303.75.) Award: $303.75 Agency: Department of Public Welfare
Cite as: Thomas Kehoe v. State of Illinois, 20 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290 (1951)
Legacy General 20 awarded 1950s Thomas Kehoe v. State of Illinois 20 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290 1951-05-08 (No. 4352-Claimant awarded $303.75.) /opinions/v20-p0312-1/

THOMAS KEHOE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act for a fractured toe sustained at work. The court awarded 10% loss of use of the left foot, amounting to $303.75, plus court reporter fees.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Statutes cited: Section 8 (d) (14) of the Workmen's Compensation Act; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949, Chapter 127, Section 180

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-when an award will be made under. Where a steamfitter, employed by the Department of Public Welfare, while on duty, dropped a piece of pipe on his toe, and fractured it, as a result of which he sustained a 10 per cent loss of his left foot, Court stated he was entitled to an award under Section 8 (d) of the Act.

Claimant, Thomas Kehoe, seeks to recover from respondent under the Workmen's Compensation Act for injuries that resulted from an accident that arose out of and in the course of his employment as a steamfitter at the Chicago State Hospital, operated by the Department of Public Welfare.

On November 10, 1949, claimant dropped a piece of pipe about three feet long on his left big toe fracturing the proximal phalange thereof. He was temporarily and totally disabled for 12 days, for which period he was paid compensation at the rate of $22.50 per week.

No jurisdictional questions are involved, and the sole question to be determined is the nature and extent of his disability.

Claimant has a pair of bad feet. He has hammer toes on both feet, and both big toes show a marked hallux valgus or inward turning of such toes, He has flat feet, and some arthritic conditions in both feet, being somewhat more acute in his left foot at the base of his left big toe.

The medical evidence is in some conflict, but it does show that there has been some aggravation of a preexisting structural deformity in his left foot.

We conclude from the evidence that claimant has sustained a 10 per cent loss of use of his left foot due to the fracture of his left big toe. No more than such per cent of loss of use can be attributed to his accident.

Any greater disability is due to structural deformity, and not his accident. [*292]

On the date of his accident, claimant was 54 years of age, a widower, and had no children under 18 years of age. His earnings in the year prior to his accident exceeded $5,000.00, and his rate of compensation is, therefore, $22.50 per week.

William J. Cleary & Co., Court Reporters, Chicago, was employed to take and transcribe the testimony before Commissioner Tearney. Charges in the amount of $51.60 were incurred, which charges are reasonable and customary. An award is entered in favor of William J. Cleary & Co. for $51.60.

An award is entered in favor of claimant, Thomas Kehoe, under Section 8 (d) (14) of the Workmen's Compensation Act for a 10 per cent loss of use of his left foot, or 13 1/2 weeks at $22.50 per week, being the sum of $303.75, all of which has accrued and is payable forthwith.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949, Chapter 127, Section 180.

Official volume 20 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1950–June 30, 1951)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.