Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

C. Weber v. Frank

19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 33 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1949-10-20 No. 4058
Disposition: (Nos. 4058 and 4059-Claims denied.) Agency: Illinois Public Aid Commission
Cite as: C. Weber v. Frank, 19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 33 (1949)
Legacy General 19 denied 1940s C. Weber v. Frank 19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 33 1949-10-20 (Nos. 4058 and 4059-Claims denied.) /opinions/v19-p0052-1/

C. WEBER, M.D., Claimant, ‘v. STATE O FILLINOIS. FRANK Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for professional services rendered to an injured employee of the Illinois Public Aid Commission. The court dismissed the claim because it was filed more than two years after the claim accrued, barring jurisdiction under the statute of limitations.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Statutes cited: Chapter 48, Paragraph 161, Illinois Revised Statutes 1947; Chapter 37, Paragraph 439.22, Illinois Revised Statutes 1947

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. NEBE ~Assistant , Attorney General, f o r Respondent. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT-where claim will be denied. Where a n employee of the Illinois Public Aid Commission was injured i n the performance of her duty and the cqmplaint shows on its face t h a t more than two ( 2 ) years had elapsed from the date of the alleged damages to the filing of the complaint, t h e Court is without jurisdiction, and .such claims a r e barred by Section 22 of the Court of Claims Act. (Chapter 37, paragraph 439.22, Illinois Revised Statutes 1947).
  2. LIMITATIONS-What constitutes. Where claimant fails to file claim -within two ( 2 ) years of the date of the accident, claim is barred by .Statute.

On January 8, 1948, the claimants filed their complaints in both of the above captioned cases which were later consolidated.

The complaints allege that on September 25, 1945, Kathryn S. Clark, an employee of the Illinois Public Aid Commission, was injured in the City of Olney, Illinois, while engaged in the performance of her duties. Claimants further allege that at the direction and request of the respondent, professional services were rendered Kathryn S. Clark.

The record consists of complaint, motion of respondent to dismiss, notice to call up motion to dismiss, reply of claimant, transcript of evidence, commissioner's report, and waiver of brief of claimant.

Section 24 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, (Chapter 48, Paragraph 161, Illinois Revised Statutes 1947) provides:

“161. No proceedings for compensation under this Act shall be maintained unless notice of the accident has been given to the employer as soon as practicable but not later than thirty days after the accident, except in cases of hernia, in which cases notice shall be given the employer within fifteen days after the accident. In case of mental incapacity of the employee or any dependents of a deceased employee who may be entitled to compensation under the provisions of this Act, the limitations of time by this Act provided shall not begin to run against said mental incompetents until a conservator or guardian has been appointed: Provided that where such limitation bars. an adult mentally competent member of a class of beneficiaries entitled to receive compensation for death, such limitation shall then bar all beneficiaries notwithstanding that another or others be mentally or otherwise incapacitated or incompetent.

“No defect or inaccuracy of such notice shall be a bar to the maintenance of proceedings of arbitration or otherwise by the employee unless the employer proves that he is unduly prejudiced in such proceedings by such defect or inaccuracy. Notice of the accident shall give the approximate date and place of the accident, if known, and may be given orally or in writing; provided, no proceedings for compensation under this Act shall be maintained unless claim for com[*35]pensation has been made within six months after the accident, provided, that in any case, unless application for compensation is filed with the Industrial Commission within one year after the date of the accident, where no compensation has been paid, or within one year after the date of the last payment of compensation, where any has been paid, the right to file such application shall be barred; Provided, further, that if the accidental injury results in death within said year, application for compensation for death may be filed with the Industrial Commission within one year after the date of death, but not thereafter.

As amended by act approved July 24, 1939."

Section 22 of the Court of Claim Act, (Chapter 37,

Paragraph 439.22, Illinois Revised Statutes 1947)

provides:

"439.22. Every claim cognizable by the Court and not otherwise sooner barred by law shall be forever barred from prosecution therein unless it is filed with the clerk of the court within two years after it first accrues, saving to infants, idiots, lunatics, insane persons and persons under other disability at the time the claim accrues two years from the time the disability ceases."

The complaint shows on its face that more than two years had elapsed from the date of the alleged damages to the filing of the complaints. Therefore, under the law, this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine these claims for the reason that the statute of limitations had run against the claimants.

Having concluded that we are without jurisdiction to hear and determine this claim, it becomes unnecessary to discuss any other questions.

The motion of the Attorney General is allowed. Complaint dismissed.

Official volume 19 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1949–June 30, 1950)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.