Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Verna. Landis v. State of Illinois

18 Ill. Ct. Cl. 61 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1948-11-09 No. 4082
Disposition: (No. 4082-Claimant awarded $572.84.) Award: $572.84 Agency: Department of Public Welfare, Elgin State Hospital
Cite as: Verna. Landis v. State of Illinois, 18 Ill. Ct. Cl. 61 (1948)
Legacy General 18 awarded 1940s Verna. Landis v. State of Illinois 18 Ill. Ct. Cl. 61 1948-11-09 (No. 4082-Claimant awarded $572.84.) /opinions/v18-p0078-1/

VERNA. LANDIS, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a tinner employed at Elgin State Hospital, fell from a ladder and fractured his heel. The court awarded $572.84 for temporary total incapacity and permanent partial loss of use of his right foot, after deducting an overpayment.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. HON. GEORGE F. BARRETT, Attorney General, and WILLIAM J. COLOHAN, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
  2. WORKMEN’S C OMPENSATION Am-step in ladder breakiltg, causing fracture, entitled to award under. Where a n employee of Elgin State Hospital sustains fracture of heel bone and impaction and flattening of the Boehler angle caused by falling from ladder, due to step giving way, and i n consequence thereof suffered pain when walking or climbing and limitation i n motion. Held that he was entitled to 33%% permanent partial loss of the use of his right foot under the Act.

Claimant, Vern A. Landis, filed his claim on April 13, 1948 for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for injuries he sustained on April 14, 1947 during the course of his employment as a tinner by the Department of Public Welfare, at the Elgin State Hospital.

No jurisdictional questions are presented by the record, and it is admitted by stipulation, that claimant sustained an injuq- by reason of an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment on April 14, 1947.

From the evidence, it appears that claimant was removing from an outside, overhead sign at the laundry building, and while engaged in this task the step of a ladder on which he was standing gave way and he fell down, striking the pavement. He was given immediate attention by Dr. Charles K. Bush, J r . at the general 110spital and was removed later the same day to the Sherman Hospital at Elgin. He was hospitalized until May 13th. His leg was placed in traction and he remained at home using crutches and later a cane. He returned to work June 7th. Prior to the accident he was in perfect health, but since then he feels as though he is walking with a pebble in his shoe; his ankle bothers him, and he has more or less constant dull pain. His leg swells if he makes a misstep. Occasionally he has an acute pain. He cannot [*63] run, raise up, climb as well as he did before, or holtl lijs weight on the foot.

Dr. Charles K. Bush, Jr., physician at the Elgin State Hospital, treated claimant on the day of the accident. X-ray revealed a fracture of the heel bone of the right foot with considerable impaction and flattening of the Boehler angle. Dr. Paul Tobin, tlie orthopedic consultant, recommended that claimant be taken to a private hospital where he could receive the benefit of orthopedic care and traction. Dr. Bush, on the basis of an esaniination on the day of the hearing, testified there was an increase in the width of the heel and limitation in eyer&on and inversion. Later X-rays all show complete healing, but the fragments of the foot are out of proper alignment. Pain on walking or climbing is to be expected and also limitation of motion. The disability is probably permanent. In his opinion, claimant would not haoe tlie ability he previously had in climbing ladders and inrolving the use of his foot will probably tire .it out quicker than normal.

From the evidence, and personal observation of claimant, Commissioner Blumeiithal recommended an award based on 33-1/3% permanent partial loss of the use of claimant’s right foot. The Court concurs in this recommendation.

Claimant was forty-nine years old and had no children under sixteen years of age. Medical and hospital expenses aggregating $542.00 mere paid by respondrnl . His earnings for the year preceding his accident mcw on the basis of $304.50 per month. His compensation riltc, therefore, would be $15.00 per week, increased by 30 54, or to $18.00 per week, the accident having occurred after July 1, 1945 and before July 1, 1947.

The period of claimant’s temporary total incapacity [*64]

was from April 14th to June 7th, 1947, and he was en

titled to receive compensation from April 15th to June

7th, 1947, a period of seven weeks and four days, at the

rate of $18.00 per week, or a sum of $136.29. For this period he was paid the sum of $373.45 for unproductive time, which represents an overpayment of $237.16.

Claimant is entitled to an award based on 33-1/30/0 permanent partial loss of the use of his right foot, which would be computed on the basis of 45 weeks, at $18.00 per week, or $810.00, from which must be deducted the overpayment of $237.16.

Claimant, Vern A. Landis, is, therefore, awarded $572.84, all of which has accrued and is payable forth-, with.

A. M. Rothbart, Court Reporter, 120 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, took and transcribed the testimony in this case, and the invoice which he submitted for this work of $36.50 we find to be fair, reasonable and customary. An award is also made to A. M. Rothbart in the sum of $36.50.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees. ”

Official volume 18 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1948–June 30, 1949)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.