Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Elvajenning-S Penwell v. State of Illinois

16 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1946-09-12 No. 3025
Disposition: (No. 3025-Claimant awarded ‘$1,646.12.) Award: $1,646.12 Agency: Illinois Soldiers' and Sailors' Children's School
Cite as: Elvajenning-S Penwell v. State of Illinois, 16 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1 (1946)
Legacy General 16 awarded 1940s Elvajenning-S Penwell v. State of Illinois 16 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1 1946-09-12 (No. 3025-Claimant awarded ‘$1,646.12.) /opinions/v16-p0020-1/

ELVAJENNING-s PENWELL,Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought an additional award for medical and nursing expenses from February 28, 1945, to April 1, 1946, due to her total paralysis from a work-related injury. The court awarded $1,646.12, finding the services reasonably required and charges reasonable.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Cases cited: Penwell v. State, 11 C. C. R. 365

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN’S CODIPENSATION ACT-when award may be made under. Where a Supervisor at the Illinois Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Children’s School at Normal, Illinois, sustains accidental injuries, arising out of and in the course of her employment, an award for compensation for such injuries may be made and for expenses of necessary medical, surgical and hospital services incurred as are reasonably required to relieve her ofi the effects of the injury; Section 8, paragraph ( a ) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Penwell vs. State, 11 C. C. R. 365.

Claimant was injured on February 2, 1936, in an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment as a Supervisor at the Illinois Soldiers' and Sailors' Children's School at Normal, Illinois. The injury was serious, causing temporary blindness and general paralysis. The facts are fully detailed in the case of Penwell v. State, 11 C. C. R. 3\65, in which an award was made to the claimant of $5,500.00 for total permanent disability, $8,215.95 for necessary medical, surgical, and hospital services expended or incurred to and including October 22, 1940, and an annual pension of $660.00. On February 10, 1942, a further award was made to claimant for medical and hospital expenses incurred from October 22, 1940, to January 1, 1942, in the amount of [*2] $1,129.82. On March 10,1943, a further award was made to claimant for medical and hospital expenses from January 1, 1942, to December 31, 1942, in the amount of $1,164.15. On March 15, 1944, a further award was made to claimant for medical and hospital expenses from January 1,1943, to and including September 30, 1943, in the amount of $853.07. On April 17, 1945, a further award was made to claimant for medical and nursing expenses incurred from October 1,1943, to and including February 28, 1945, in the amount of $1,955.29. Claim is now made for an additional award of $1,666.12 for medical and nursing expenses from February 28, 1945, to and including April 1,1946.

Claimant remains totally paralyzed from the waist down, the paralysis being of a spastic type; her physical condition has not improved. She has no control over her lower limbs, nor over urine and faeces. From February 28, 1945, to and including April 1, 1946, she has been required, to relieve her of her injury, and to 'prevent deformity and to stimulate circulation, and for relief of bed sores, to employ and receive medical services and nursing attention. She remains helpless, requiring the services of nurses or attendants to move her to and from her bed, to change her bed clothing at least three or four times a day, to administer light treatment to the affected parts of her paralyzed body, and to rub her body with ointments prescribed by her physician. Because of the complete paralysis of her lower abdomen and legs, the functioning of her kidneys and bladder is impaired, and medical attention is required to flush these organ's and to prevent infection arising from her impaired circulation and paralysis. The services of a physician are needed almost daily and must be rendered in her home.

Claimant has therefore employed a physician on a [*3] monthly basis at a charge of $75.00 per month, which is a lesser rate than ordinarily charged, and for which she seeks reimbursement in the total sum of $825.00. Claimant also seeks reimbursement, at the rate of fifty cents per day, in the total amount of $182.50, for board and room of attending nurses. Such expenditure obviates the employment of both a day and a night nurse. In addition, claimant has expended, for nursing services, $618.50, and for drugs and supplies, $40.12. She has submitted to the court, with her verified petition, the original receipts and vouchers showing payment of these respective items, except a medical expenditure of $75.00 for which a receipt for $55.00 only is submitted. This must be disallowed to the extent of $20.00.

This court has heretofore held that under Section 8, paragraph (a) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, claimant is entitled to such care as is reasonably required to relieve her of the effects of the injury. (Penwell v. State, supra.) There has been no change in claimant's physical condition to justify the denial of an award at this time. The services claimed appear to have been reasonably required and the charges to be reasonable and just.

Award is, therefore, made to the elaimant for medical and nursing expenses from February 28,1945, to and including April 1,1946,in the sum of $1,646.12, which has accrued and is payable forthwith. The court reserves for future determination claimant's ,need for further medical, surgical and hospital services.

Official volume 16 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1946–June 30, 1947)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.