Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Lillian N. Dowling v. State of Illinois

15 Ill. Ct. Cl. 104 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1946-03-19 No. 3907
Disposition: (No. 3907-Claimant awarded $57.60.) Award: $57.60 Agency: Department of Labor
Cite as: Lillian N. Dowling v. State of Illinois, 15 Ill. Ct. Cl. 104 (1946)
Legacy General 15 awarded 1940s Lillian N. Dowling v. State of Illinois 15 Ill. Ct. Cl. 104 1946-03-19 (No. 3907-Claimant awarded $57.60.) /opinions/v15-p0122-1/

LILLIAN N. DOWLING,Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent. Opinicm filed March lg, 1946.

Case summary

Claimant, a state employee, slipped and fell at work, seeking compensation for medical expenses and disability. The court awarded $57.60 for medical and reporting services but denied disability claims due to lack of evidence.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATTON ACT-employee of the Department of
  2. Labor within provisions of - when claim for injuries not compensable under-when cknim for medical a d hospital services may bel allowed. Where it appears that an employee of the Department of Labor, while in the discharge of her duties, slipped and fell, sustaining injuries to her right ankle and left knee, but evidence completely fails to show that she was thereby partially incapacitated from her usual and customary linw of employment, the claim will be denied. Where special medical care is authorized, an award may be made for the cost thereof.

On August 18, 1944, claimant, an employee of the Department of Labor, while in the discharge of her duties as such employee, slipped and fell, sustaining a concussion, and a sprained right ankle and left knee. By direction of her superior, she was placed under the care of her family physician, Dr. Charles H. Connor, until she was able to return to work, a period of approximately six weeks.

Claimant had no children under sixteen years of age [*105] dependent upon her for support. She was employed by the respondent at a salary of $125.00 per month. At the time of the accident, the claimant and respondent were operating under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act of this State, and notice of the accident and claim for ccmpensation were made within the time provided by the Act. The aqcident arose out of and in the course of the employment.

No claim is made for temporary disabilty, but claim is made for medical and hospital services in the total amount of $41.10. Claim is also made for twenty weeks' loss of use of claimant's left knee and right ankle, and for general disability, due to the alleged head injury.

The claimant, testifying on her own behalf, stated that her physical condition since the accident is "not very good," and that her health was "jeopardized through this fall." She said she has pains in her stomach, in the ankle, and in the knee, and that she has a continuous pain in her head. She testified that she had lost time from work since the accident, because of an attack of lobar pneumonia. There is nothing in the record, however, to indicate any connection between the pneumonia and the injury.

Alexander W. Reid, called as a witness on behalf of the claimant, stated that he was head of the Executive Department of the Illinois Industrial Commission; that he authorized the employment of the claimant's family physician to care for her following the injury. He also testified that since the injury claimant appeared to have lost considerable weight and to be in a more nervous condition than she was prior to the injury.

Claimant returned to her same employment six weeks after the aacident, and is now receiving a salary larger than she received prior to the injury. There is not a [*106] scintilla of evidence indicating that the claimant, as a result of the accident, is partially incapacitated from pursuing her usual and customary line of employment ; there is not a scintilla of evidence in the record to indicate any specific loss of use of either her ankle or her knee. Defendant has wholly failed to prove any disability resulting from the injury .which might be compensated under the provisions of the Workman’s Compensation Act of this State.

Claimant, however, is entitled to be reimbursed for the medical and hospital services which she paid, in the total amount of $11.10,and is entitled to the additional sum of $30.00 for the use of Dr. Charles H. Connor for medical services, and to the sum of $16.50 for the use of A. M. Rothbart, Court Reporting Service, for services in taking and transcribing the testimony in the case.

Award is therefore made in favor of the claimant in the total amount of $57.60 to be paid as follows: $30.00 for the use of Dr. Charles H. Connor; $11.10 to claimant for medical and hospital services; and $16.50 for the use of A. M. Itothbart Court Reporting Service.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the . payment of compensation awards to State employees,’’ and is payable, upon approval, from the appropriation from the General Revenue Fund in the manner provided in such act.

Official volume 15 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1945–June 30, 1946)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.