Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Louis E. Mitchell v. State of Illinois

14 Ill. Ct. Cl. 37 Illinois Court of Claims Filed September 12, 1944. No. 3807
Disposition: (No. 3807-Claimant awarded $1,423.82.) Award: $1,423.82 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways
Cite as: Louis E. Mitchell v. State of Illinois, 14 Ill. Ct. Cl. 37 (1944)
Legacy General 14 awarded 1940s Louis E. Mitchell v. State of Illinois 14 Ill. Ct. Cl. 37 September 12, 1944. (No. 3807-Claimant awarded $1,423.82.) /opinions/v14-p0056-1/

LOUIS E. MITCHELL, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a highway worker, suffered an injury to his left hand that led to amputation of a finger and loss of use of the hand. The court found the injury arose out of and in the course of employment and awarded compensation for temporary total disability and permanent partial disability, totaling $1,444.61.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION Am-when award m u y be made under. Where it appears an employee of the State sustained a bruise on the palm of his left hand, and because of subsequent infection, it became necessary to amputate the second finger of his left hand,, arising out of and in the course of employment, while within the protection of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, an award may be made therefor, in accordance with the provision of said Act upon compliance with the requirements thereof.

On June 3, 1942, claimant, Louis E. Mitchell, was an employee of the Department of Public Works and Buildings of the State of Illinois, Division of Highways. While ’ pushing a wheelbarrow loaded with stone chips to be used in a bituminous mixture for asphalt shoulders along U. S. Route No. 40, he sustained a bruise in the palm of his left hand. Because of subsequent infection, he was under the care of various doctors from June 11,1942, to January 8, 1943. During the course of treatment, it be[*38]

I 38

came necessary to amputate the second finger of his left hand; the remaining fingers having become stiff and strophied.

At the time of the accident, claimant and respondent . were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Ad; of this State, and notice of the accident and claim for compensation were made within the time provided by Ihe Act. The accident arose out of and in the course of the employment.

Claimant had been in the employ of the Division approximately two weeks preceding the date of the injury, at a wage rate of 55 cents per hour. Eight hours constituted a normal working day, and employees of the Division engaged in the same capacity and at the same . rate as claimant are employed less-than two hundred - days a year. At the time of the accident claimant had no children under sixteen years of age dependent upon him for support. The basis for determining compensation is therefore a weekly wage of $16.92.

Claimant was temporarily totally disabled from June 3,1942, to January 8, 1943, a period of 31-2J7 weeks, and was paid compensation in the total amount of $270.48.

During this period, however, he was entitled to compensation in the amount of $291.27, so there remains due to him on account of temporary total disability the sum of $20.79.

No claim is made for medical, hospital, or surgical services, but claim is made for total loss of use of claimant’s left hand. It is undisputed that he has lost the second finger by amputation, and has suffered serious injury to the first, third, and fourth fingers, and to the tissues of the palm of the hand. Although the original injury appeared slight, the resulting infection was very serious, due partly to the fact that claimant at the time [*39] suffered from diabetes. On August 7, 1942, Dr. J. Albert Key, Professor of Drthopedics at Washington University, St. Louis, reported to the respondent as follows: , “* * * Physical examination- the left hand is considerably swollen; the stump of the middle finger is covered by a granulating wound which is infected; there are two small granulating wounds on o the dorsal surface of the hand, apparently old drainage incisions; and there are also sinuses in the palm of the hand at the base of the middle finger. The palm of the hand is distended and when pressure * is made on the palm, thick yellow pus exudes from the sinus at the base of the middle finger. There is an infected wound on the tip of the thumb; the index, ring and little fingers are contracted, hyperextended at the base and flexed at the terminal joints. * * *” On December 3, 1942, Dr. Key again reported: “I examined Mr. Louis E. Mitchell on November 17. He still has marked disability of his hand, the flexor tendons of the index and ring fingers having been completely destroyed by the infection and all of the soft tissues of the hand having been severely damaged. * * *” From the medical reports and from perspnal observation of the claimant, the court is of the opinion that claimant has suffered a ninety per cent loss of use of his left hand. He is therefore entitled’to the sum of $8.46 per week for a period of 153 weeks, or the total sum of $1,294.38. Since the injury occurred subsequent to July 1, 1941, the award must be increased ten per cent or $129.44, making a total of $1,423.82.

Award is therefore entered in favor of the claimant for the total sum of $1,444.61 to be paid to him as follows : (1) The sum of $859.18 which has accrued and is payable forthwith. (2) The sum of $585.43 payable in 62 weekly in. stallments of $9.31 each, beginning September 12th, 1944, with a final payment of $8.21.

Official volume 14 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1944–June 30, 1945)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.