Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Brown v. State of Illinois

12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 287 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1942-11-10 No. 3273
Disposition: (No. 3273-Claimant awarded $23.25.) Award: $23.25 Agency: Illinois State Penitentiary
Cite as: Brown v. State of Illinois, 12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 287 (1942)
Legacy General 12 awarded 1940s Brown v. State of Illinois 12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 287 1942-11-10 (No. 3273-Claimant awarded $23.25.) /opinions/v12-p0304-1/

13. F. BROWN,Claimant, 21s. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent. -

Case summary

The claimant, successor sheriff, sought payment for transporting prisoners to the penitentiary. The court awarded $23.25 because the service was rendered and vouchers submitted within a reasonable time, but payment was refused due to a lapsed appropriation.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company vs. State, 10 C. C. R. 243; Litchfield and Madison Railway Company vs. State, 11 C. C. R. 455

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SmvIcEs-lapse of appropriation before payment-stLficient unexpended balmice in-when award may be made for value of. Where it clearly appears that State is liable for services rendered and that bill therefor, in correct ’, amount is submitted within a reasonable time and due to no fault or negligence of claimant, same is not approved and vouchered for payment, before lapse of appropriation from which payable, a n award may be made for amount due therefor, where there is sufficient unexpended balance in said appropriation to pay same, on claim-filed within a reasonable time.

W. S. Osborne, as sheriff of Marghall County, Illinois, on March 4, 1937, conveyed and delivered to the Warden of the Illinois State Penitentiary, at Joliet, Illinois, two prisoners who had been convicted and sentenced at the October term of the Circuit Court of Marshall County. The prisoners were conveyed together by automobile by way of Illinois State Route No. 17 from Lacon to Dwight, Illinois, and by way of Illinois State Route No. 66 from Dwight, Illinois to the Illinois State Penitentiary at Joliet, a distance of ninetythree miles. For this service, the sheriff was entitled to be paid twenty-five cents per mile, in going only, or a total sum of $23.25. Because the sheriff did not have the statements of the presiding judge and the State's attorney of the county for delivery to the warden, the sheriff's receipt for the prisoners was withheld. The statements were sent to the warden by the State's attorney on October 15, 1937. Claim was pre[*288]sented by the sheriff to the Department of Public Welfare by sending original vouchers to the Department on November 1, 1937 ; payment was refused because the appropriation from which these fees were payable had lapsed on September 30, 1937. The claimant, R. F. Brown, is successor to W. S. Osborne, and is the present duly elected, qualified and acting sheriff of Marshall County.

Under the law, claimant was clearly entitled to payment for the services rendered, submitted vouchers therefor within a reasonable time, and has not received payment. The non-payment is due to no fault of the claimant. When the charge {vas incurred there remained a sufficient unexpended balance in the appropriation from which payment could have been made. Claimant is therefore entitled to an award.

Elgim, Joliet awl Easter Railway C o m p my vs. State, 10 C. C. R. 243; Litdhfield and Madisoq%Railway Compafiy vs. State, 11 C. C. R. 455.

An award is therefore entered in favor of the claimant in the sum of $23.25.

Official volume 12 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1941–June 30, 1943)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.