Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Swift & Company v. State of Illinois

10 Ill. Ct. Cl. 319 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1938-05-11 No. 3221
Disposition: (No. 3221-Claimant awarded $81.13.) Award: $81.13 Agency: Division of Highways
Cite as: Swift & Company v. State of Illinois, 10 Ill. Ct. Cl. 319 (1938)
Legacy General 10 awarded 1930s Swift & Company v. State of Illinois 10 Ill. Ct. Cl. 319 1938-05-11 (No. 3221-Claimant awarded $81.13.) /opinions/v10-p0342-1/

PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for gasoline and motor oil delivered to the Division of Highways, which was not paid because the appropriation lapsed. The court awarded the amount due, finding no fault of claimant, and denied interest.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Rock Island Sand & Gravel Co. vs. State, 8 C. C. R. 165; Southern Kraft Corp. vs. State, 9 C. C. R. 306

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SYLLABUS-lapse of appropriation-when award may be made for. The facts in this case are the same as those in Rock Island Sand & Gravel Co. vs. State, 8 Court of Claims Reports, page 165 and Rorst & Stricter Company, vs. State, No. 3191, infra, and what was said in those cases is applicable herein.

A stipulation, signed by claimant and respondent, has been filed herein. From the recitals thereof it appears that during the months of April and June, 1937 an order was placed by the Division of Highways under No. 87855 for the delivery to the Highway Division of certain gasoline and motor oil as set out in Claimant's Exhibits "A" and "B," and that such supplies were furnished during the period mentioned to a total value of $81.13.

A report by M. K. Lingle, Engineer of Claims, from the Division of Highways, states that the supplies in question were duly delivered, received and used by respondent at the times and places stated, and that the prices charged are in accord with those contained in the contract between the parties; that the bills were not presented for payment until after September 30, 1937 and were not eligible for payment out of the 59th Biennium Appropriation, for the reason that such appropriation had lapsed. It further appears that at the time the purchase order was issued and at the time the supplies in question were delivered, there remained unexpended in the appropriation from which the same was properly payable, a balance sufficient to pay for same. [*320]

As heretofore held in the case of Rock Island Sand & Gravel Co. vs. State, 8 C. C. R. 165, and other cases, "Where claimant has rendered services or furnished supplies to the State on the order or request of an official authorized to contract for the same, and submits a bill therefor within a reasonable time, and due to no negligence or fault on the part of claimant same is not approved and vouchered for payment before the appropriation from which it is payable lapses, an award for the reasonable and customary value of the services or supplies will be made where, at the time the obligation was incurred, there were sufficient funds remaining unexpended in the appropriation to pay for the same."

No sufficient showing of negligence or fault upon the part of claimant to justify non-payment of the bill appears, and pursuant to the rulings heretofore made, an award is hereby allowed in favor of claimant in the sum of $81.13.

The application of claimant for interest on the amount of said bill is denied as there is no statute in the State which permits the payment of costs and interest. (See Southern Kraft Corp. vs. State, 9 C. C. R. 306.)

Official volume 10 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between July 1, 1937–June 30, 1939, and advisory Opinions furnished Illinois Emergency Relief Commission)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.