Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Indian Motor Cycle Company v. State of Illinois

9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 526 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1937-06-11 No. 3098
Disposition: (No. 3098-Claimant awarded $44.20.) Award: $44.20 Agency: Illinois Division of Highways
Cite as: Indian Motor Cycle Company v. State of Illinois, 9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 526 (1937)
Legacy General 9 awarded 1930s Indian Motor Cycle Company v. State of Illinois 9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 526 1937-06-11 (No. 3098-Claimant awarded $44.20.) /opinions/v09-p0549-1/

INDIAN MOTOR CYCLE COMPANY, ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sold motorcycle parts to the Illinois Division of Highways on order, but the appropriation lapsed before payment was issued through no fault of claimant. The court awarded $44.20, following precedent that payment is due when funds were available at the time of order and claimant submitted a timely bill.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Rock Island Sand & Gravel Co. vs. State, 8 C. C. R. 165; Individual Towel & Cabinet Service Co. vs. State, 6 C. C. R. 407; Grant Tire Co. vs. State, 7 C. C. R. 183

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SUPPLIES-when award may be made for. Where it is conceded that the State received merchandise, as ordered by it, and that bill therefor, which is unquestioned, was not presented for payment before lapse of appropriation out of which it could be paid, an award will be made for price thereof, on claim filed within a reasonable time. INDIAN MOTOR CYCLE COMPANY, A CORPORATION v. 527 STATE OF ILLINOIS.

This claim was filed on May 10, 1937 with the clerk of this court, and on the 17th day of May, 1937, a stipulation was entered into between the claimant and the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, wherein it is stipulated and agreed by the parties that the claimant, pursuant to an order and request on the part of the respondent, sold and delivered on June 12, 1935, to the Illinois Division of Highways Garage, Springfield, Illinois, for the use of respondent, certain motorcycle parts as itemized in the account attached to the complaint, of the reasonable value of $44.20; that at the time these articles were ordered, there was in the appropriation from which they were payable, sufficient funds to pay for the same, and that when the appropriation lapsed on September 30, 1935, there still remained an unexpended balance sufficient to pay for these articles.

It is further stipulated that claimant presented its bill for said articles to the respondent prior to the lapse of said appropriation, but due to the delay in the vouching of the same for payment, the appropriation lapsed before a warrant therefor was issued. Consequently, the claimant has not been paid.

We have repeatedly held that: "Where claimant has rendered services or furnished supplies to the State on the order or request of an official authorized to contract for the same, and submits a bill therefor within a reasonable time, and due to no neglect or fault on the part of claimant, same is not approved and vouchered for payment before the appropriation from which it is payable lapses, an award for the reasonable and customary value of the services or supplies will be made where at the time the expenditure was contracted there were sufficient funds remaining in the appropriation to pay for same."

Rock Island Sand & Gravel Co. vs. State, 8 C. C. R. 165.

Individual Towel & Cabinet Service Co. vs. State, 6 C. C. R. 407.

Grant Tire Co. vs. State, 7 C. C. R. 183.

The Attorney General admits that this claim falls within the rule and should be paid.

An award, therefore, in the sum of $44.20 in favor of Indian Motor Cycle Company, a corporation, is hereby approved.

Official volume 9 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1935–June 30, 1937, and advisory Opinions furnished Illinois Emergency Relief Commission)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.