Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Jesse R. Wagner v. State of Illinois

9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 106 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-11-12 No. 2650
Disposition: (No. 2650-Claim denied) Agency: Division of Highways
Cite as: Jesse R. Wagner v. State of Illinois, 9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 106 (1935)
Legacy General 9 denied 1930s Jesse R. Wagner v. State of Illinois 9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 106 1935-11-12 (No. 2650-Claim denied) /opinions/v09-p0129-1/

JESSE R. WAGNER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $112.30 for damage to his automobile from a collision with a state truck. The court dismissed the claim because there is no legal basis for state liability for negligence of its employees absent a statute.

Claim type: Property Damage

Cases cited: Derby vs. State 7 C. C. R. 145; Chumbler vs. State 6 C. C. R. 138

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-when no award can be made for. Where property damage results from the negligence of a State employee, no award can be made for such damage, as the doctrine of respondent superior is not applicable to the State.

Claimant seeks an award of One Hundred Twelve and 30/100 Dollars ($112.30) for damages to his automobile and expense incurred therewith as the result of an automobile collision with a State truck operated by one Joe Witteker.

The complainant alleges that he was driving his automobile in a northerly direction on U. S. Highway No. 66, on March 5, 1935, approaching the intersection of State Highway No. 116; that Joe Witteker of Cullom, Illinois was driving State truck No. 527, as an employee of the Division of Highways; that Witteker negligently and carelessly drove the State truck across the path of claimant's car striking and damaging it and causing him incidental expense thereto in the total sum of One Hundred Twelve and 30/100 Dollars ($112.30.)

The Attorney General on behalf of respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the claim for the reason that there is no legal basis of liability by which the State can be held liable for the negligence of its agents and employees. Such is the rule unless there is a statute making the State liable. This rule has been announced in many cases. See Derby vs. State 7 C. C. R. 145 and Chumbler vs. State 6 C. C. R. 138.

The motion is sustained and the claim dismissed.

Official volume 9 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1935–June 30, 1937, and advisory Opinions furnished Illinois Emergency Relief Commission)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.