WALTER BOROWSKI, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought damages as a passenger in an incident, but the court denied the claim based on the same reasoning as in Schultz v. State of Illinois, No. 2059, where a motion to dismiss was sustained.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Cases cited: Joseph Schultz vs. State of Illinois, No. 2059

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

The facts in this case are the same as those in the case of Joseph Schultz vs. State, No. 2059, post and the decision of this court in said case is applicable herein.

JOHN R. McSWEENEY, for claimant. OTTO KERNER, Attorney General; JOHN KASSERMAN, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Linscott delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is based upon the same set of facts as set forth in the case of Joseph Schultz vs. State of Illinois, No. 2059, except that in this case the claimant was a passenger, which, in our opinion, does not change the legal situation.

The Attorney General also made a motion to dismiss this case, and the motion will be sustained for the same reasons as set forth in Schultz vs. State of Illinois, No. 2059.