Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Shell Petroleum Corporation v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 720 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-06-01 No. 2254
Disposition: (No. 2254-Claimant awarded $60.52.) Award: $60.52 Agency: Anna State Hospital
Cite as: Shell Petroleum Corporation v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 720 (1935)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Shell Petroleum Corporation v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 720 1935-06-01 (No. 2254-Claimant awarded $60.52.) /opinions/v08-p0710-1/

SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $60.52 for kerosene and gasoline sold to Anna State Hospital. The court found the claim just and equitable and awarded the full amount.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SUPPLIES-when award may be made for. Where it is stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for State and claimant that there is due claimant a certain amount for goods sold and delivered to State on its order, and claim and amount thereof appear to be just and equitable, an award may be made in accordance with such stipulation.

This claim was filed October 23, 1933 for the sum of $60.52 for kerosene and gasoline sold to the Anna State Hospital.

It appears that there was a running account with this Institution. In the files there is a stipulation between counsel for both sides, and the amount due the claimant has been agreed upon, which is the sum of $60.52.

No objection being made on the part of the Attorney General, and it appearing to the court that this claim is just and equitable, and should be paid, we make an award for the amount due, which is the amount of $60.52.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.