Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Brown Shoe Company v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 547 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-04-30 No. 2551
Disposition: (No. 2551-Claimant awarded $48.75.) Award: $48.75 Agency: State Training School for Girls at Geneva, Illinois
Cite as: Brown Shoe Company v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 547 (1935)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Brown Shoe Company v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 547 1935-04-30 (No. 2551-Claimant awarded $48.75.) /opinions/v08-p0537-1/

BROWN SHOE COMPANY, ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sold shoes to the State Training School for Girls; the bill was misplaced but the shoes were received and used. The court allowed the claim because the State received the supplies in regular course of administration and no objection was raised.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. STIPULUS-when award may be made for. Where it appears that State received merchandise, as ordered by it, and that bill therefor was not presented for payment before lapse of appropriation out of which it could be paid, an award for amount due may be made.

The complaint herein alleges that claimant on July 12, 1933 at the request of Florence Monohan, Managing Officer of the State Training School for Girls at Geneva, Illinois, sold to said school twenty-five pairs of shoes at One and 95/100 Dollars ($1.95) per pair or a total value of Forty-eight and 75/100 Dollars ($48.75); that the shoes were shipped in accordance with the order received by the institution. No reason for non-payment in regular course appears in the complaint but the record discloses that in some way the bill or unpaid invoice was misplaced; that the shoes were received in satisfactory condition and used by the institution. [*518]

The facts being undisputed that the State received the supplies pursuant to order in regular course of administration of the institution and no objection being raised by the respondent, the claim is allowed.

An award is therefore recommended in favor of plaintiff in the sum of Forty-eight and 75 100 Dollars ($48.75).

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.