JOHN F. RYAN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought damages to his car from the same accident as in Goldie Ryan v. State, No. 2062. The court denied the claim, incorporating the reasons set forth in that case.

Claim type: Property Damage

Cases cited: Goldie Ryan vs. State, No. 2062

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

The facts in this case are fully set forth in the case of Goldie Ryan vs. State, No. 2062, ante, and the opinion in same controls here.

J. A. MERRY AND EDWARD E. ADAMS, for claimant. OTTO KERNER, Attorney General; JOHN KASSERMAN, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HOLLERICH delivered the opinion of the court:

This case arises out of the same accident which was involved in the case of Goldie Ryan vs. State, No. 2062. The claimant herein is the husband of said Goldie Ryan, and was the owner of the car which was damaged in that accident, and seeks in this case to recover damages done to his car as the result of such accident. The facts in the case are fully set forth in the case of Goldie Ryan vs. State, No. 2062, to which reference is hereby made. What is said in that case applies with equal force to this case. For the reasons set forth in the case of Goldie Ryan vs. State, No. 2062, award herein is denied and the case dismissed.