Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Goodyear Service v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 303 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1934-12-11 No. 2078
Disposition: (No. 2078-Claimant awarded $55.53.) Award: $55.53 Agency: Bureau of Machinery
Cite as: Goodyear Service v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 303 (1934)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Goodyear Service v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 303 1934-12-11 (No. 2078-Claimant awarded $55.53.) /opinions/v08-p0293-1/

GOODYEAR SERVICE, INCORPORATED, ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought refund of $55.53 for auto tires supplied to the Bureau of Machinery; the court awarded the amount because the State received supplies legally ordered and the bill was not presented until after the appropriation lapsed, with no unreasonable delay.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Shell Petroleum Corp. vs. State, 7 C. C. R. 224; Grant Tire Company vs. State, 7 C. C. R. 183

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. Syllabus-when award will be made for. Where it appears that State received supplies as ordered by it, and that bill therefor was not presented for payment before lapse of appropriation out of which it could be paid, an award for amount due will be made.

This claim was filed February 24, 1933, asking a refund of $55.53 alleged due claimant for auto supplies in the total sum of $55.53. The records show that the merchandise in question was furnished by the Lincoln Tire Company to the Bureau of Machinery of the State of Illinois, and that, that company has been succeeded by Goodyear Service, Incorporated; the merchandise (auto tires) were supplied to Mr.

Cleveland and the only reason apparently for the delay in payment is, that the appropriation lapsed before the presentation of the bill. "Where the facts are undisputed that the State has received supplies legally ordered and that a bill therefor was not presented for payment until after the lapsing of the appropriation out of which such bill could have been paid, an award for the amount due will be made, unless it appears there has been an unreasonable and unexplained delay upon the part of the claimant."

Shell Petroleum Corp. vs. State, 7 C. C. R. 224.

Grant Tire Company vs. State, 7 C. C. R. 183.

An award is made for Fifty-five and 53/100 Dollars.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.