Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Jetter v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1933-11-21 No. 1911
Disposition: (No. 1911-Claimant awarded $490.70.) Award: $490.70 Agency: State Power Plant
Cite as: Jetter v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19 (1933)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Jetter v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19 1933-11-21 (No. 1911-Claimant awarded $490.70.) /opinions/v08-p0039-1/

LOUIS M. JETTER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a state employee, was injured by hot water and steam while repairing a pump. The court awarded $490.70 for medical expenses and loss of vision in his right eye, finding the injury and resulting cataract were caused by the accident.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-expense incurred as result of-when award may be made for. Where State employee engaged in extra hazardous occupation was injured while in the performance of his duties, as a result of which he suffered loss of vision of his right eye and incurred expense for medical and hospital care, an award may be made for reimbursement for such expenses and for the said loss of vision.

LOUIS M. JETTER, claimant herein, as shown by the record, was an employee of the State at the State Power Plant in Springfield on September 11, 1931. While repairing a pump, a gasket was blown out, a stream of hot water blown against the right side of the face and body of claimant. He was taken to the hospital and certain expenses were incurred by him as follows: Springfield Hospital .............................................. $73.70 Dr. M. J. Jellife...................................................... 57.00 Marian Dye, nurse hire............................................ 30.00 Asbuties Peters, nurse hire..................................... 30.00 Total ................................................................ $190.70 Claim is made for reimbursement of this expense and for the further sum of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) for [*20] loss of vision in the right eye, said sum of Three Hundred Dollars being the amount for which claimant states he might obtain an operation to remove a cataract from his right eye; such cataract being claimed by claimant to be the result of said accident. Although there is some question when considering all the record whether the steam to which claimant was exposed would cause the cataract, the court is of the opinion that the cataract in question was the result of the accident.

The testimony of Dr. Jones, a State physician, is that the claimant has traumatic cataract, and that the pressure of water at one hundred fifty pounds (150 lbs.) could cause such cataract. Claimant testified that the pressure of water at the time of the accident, striking his eye and face, was, in his judgment, one hundred and fifty pounds, and the temperature of same from one hundred eighty to two hundred (180-200) degrees. Dr. Jones further testified that claimant has a total loss of vision of his right eye, with light perception and light projection remaining, same due to the traumatic cataract that was caused by the injury in question. It is further stipulated by claimant that an award of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) would be accepted in full satisfaction for the loss of vision of said eye in view of a possible relief to be expected from an operation that might be performed thereon.

Claimant was an employee of the State, and engaged in the performance of his duties at the time of the accident.

The court is of the opinion that the case is one in which an award may properly be made; that the sum of Four Hundred Ninety Dollars and seventy cents ($490.70) is a reasonable and proper award in the premises, and such amount is allowed in full settlement of all claim against the State for injuries or loss, and expense resulting from the said accident.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.