Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Bartle v. State of Illinois

7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 85 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1932-11-14 No. 1620
Disposition: (No. 1620-Claim denied.) Agency: School District No. 32, Clinton County
Cite as: Bartle v. State of Illinois, 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 85 (1932)
Legacy General 7 denied 1930s Bartle v. State of Illinois 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 85 1932-11-14 (No. 1620-Claim denied.) /opinions/v07-p0103-1/

GRACE BARTLE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $10,000 for injuries from a fall on a defective stairway in a school building. The court denied the claim, holding that neither the school district nor the State is liable for negligence of the board of education absent a statute expressly providing such liability.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Cases cited: Lindstrom vs. City of Chicago, 331 Ill. 144; Peritz vs. State, 6 Ct. Cl. 356

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-State not liable for personal injuries sustained by person in a public school building under control and supervision of board of education. Where the board of education of a school district has the management, control and supervision of the schools of the district the State is not liable for personal injuries sustained by a person while in a school of such district.
  2. SCHOOL DISTRICT-agency of State. School district is an agency of the State created to perform such duties as the State deems necessary to maintain therein free schools and neither the district nor the State is liable for the negligence of the board of education.

This action is for $10,000.00 damages claimant alleges she sustained on account of injuries occasioned by a fall on the stairway of the school building in School District No. 32, of Clinton County. On May 25, 1930, the baccalaureate sermon for the graduating class of the school was delivered in the school building. Claimant attended those services and while leaving the building "tripped on a loose and defective matting on one of the steps of the main stairway leading toward the main exit of the building and fell headlong down a flight of seven steps into the exit doors." Her right arm was broken at the wrist and her arms and legs and other portions of her body were bruised and injured by the fall.

The foregoing facts are set forth in the declaration. It also charges the board of education of the school district "know or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known" the "step was in a dangerous and unsafe condition" and negligently failed to properly repair it and put it in a safe condition.

The State has questioned the sufficiency of the declaration and the jurisdiction of this court by its plea.

The school building was under the supervision and control of the board of education of the school district. But the district is the mere agency of the State created to perform [*86] such duties as the State deems necessary to maintain therein a free school. It follows, therefore, that neither the district nor the State is liable for the negligence of the board of education unless such liability is expressly provided by some statute. (Lindstrom vs. City of Chicago, 331 Ill. 144; Peritz vs. State, 6 Ct. Cl. 356.) As there is no statute making the State liable for injuries caused by the negligent acts of school boards claimant is not entitled to an award. The claim is denied and the case dismissed.

Official volume 7 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1931–June 30, 1933)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.