WARD BAKING COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant failed to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, so the court dismissed the claim without an award.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Where,

upon motion of Attorney General to show cause why case should not be dis- Attorney General, and duly moves the court for dismissal,

Per Curiam:

Now comes the respondent by Oscar E. Carlstrom, its Attorney General, and duly moves the court for dismissal, pursuant to an order to show cause entered by this court on the 12th day of January, 1932, wherein the claimant was ordered to show cause on or before September 13, 1932, why the above entitled cause should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. And it appearing to the court that sufficient cause has not been shown by claimant, in accordance with the requirements of said order;

It is therefore, hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed, that said claim be and is hereby dismissed without an award, for want of prosecution, and the case stricken from the docket.

Done in open court during the above regular session this 13th day of September, A. D. 1932.