Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Oscar Phil v. State of Illinois

7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 12 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-09-08 No. 1751
Disposition: (No. 1751-Claim denied.) Agency: Division of Highways
Cite as: Oscar Phil v. State of Illinois, 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 12 (1931)
Legacy General 7 denied 1930s Oscar Phil v. State of Illinois 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 12 1931-09-08 (No. 1751-Claim denied.) /opinions/v07-p0030-1/

OSCAR PHIL, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $3,000 under the Workmen's Compensation Act for two work-related injuries. The court found the State had already paid all medical expenses and wages due, so the claim was denied.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-when award will be denied. Where the evidence shows that claimant had received from the State all that he was entitled to for accidental injuries, claim for further compensation will be denied.

Claimant was employed by the State as a laborer in the Division of Highways and on December 31, 1926, while engaged in his work, received an injury to his foot which resulted in his being unable to work for about eight months.

On November 27, 1929, while engaged at his work, he was struck by an automobile resulting in an injury to his head and bruises on his person. This last injury incapacitated him for work for about six weeks. He has filed his claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act for $3,000.00.

The record shows that the State paid all his hospital and doctors bills and paid him his regular wage of $4.50 per day during a considerable portion of the time he was unable to work on account of the first injury and $2.25 a day for a part of the time. It also shows that he was paid his regular wage of $4.50 during the time he was incapacitated by the second injury. The injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment, and the State became liable to compensate him in accordance with the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act. From the evidence on file we find that he has received from the State all that he was entitled to receive and the claim is therefore denied and the case dismissed.

Official volume 7 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1931–June 30, 1933)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.