Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Wagner Printing Co. v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 516 1931-05-14 (No. 1764-Claimant awarded $519.51.) /opinions/v06-p0605-1/ WAGNER PRINTING CO., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought payment of a balance due on a printing contract with the Adjutant General's office. The court found the work satisfactory and the bill reasonable, and recommended the claim be allowed for $519.51.
Claim type: Contract
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- CONTRACT-when award will be made for balance due on contract.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-
CONTRACT-when award will be made for balance due on contract. Where no fund remained in an appropriation to pay the full contract price of printing furnished by the State, an award will be recommended for the balance due on the contract. C. R. YOUNG, THRAS., for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLETON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
MR. JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim for a balance due claimant on a contract entered into between claimant and the State of Illinois for printing for the Adjutant General's office. The total amount of the contract was $4,964.46. The State paid the sum of $4,444.95, being all the funds remaining in the appropriation for that purpose, leaving a balance due claimant of $519.51.
It appears to the court that the work was satisfactory and the bill is reasonable. Therefore the court recommends to the Legislature that the claim be allowed for $519.51.
Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.