Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Carlson Brothers, Inc. v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 573 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1742
Disposition: (No. 1742-Claimant awarded $75.79.) Award: $75.79 Agency: Department of Purchases and Construction
Cite as: Carlson Brothers, Inc. v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 573 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Carlson Brothers, Inc. v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 573 1931-05-14 (No. 1742-Claimant awarded $75.79.) /opinions/v06-p0602-1/

CARLSON BROTHERS, INC., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant furnished office furniture to the Department of Purchases and Construction. The court awarded $75.79 because the price was fair and reasonable, and the bill was not paid due to claimant's failure to present it before the appropriation lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SUPPLIES-when award will be made for supplies furnished the State.

It appears that claimant furnished the Department of Purchases and Construction, upon order of those in authority, [*554] 1 oak revolving chair with pad, $13.05; 1 oak pedestal typewriter desk, $57.05; and 2 Faultless book covers, $5.04, making a total of $75.79. The price was fair and reasonable. And it further appearing that the reason the bill was not paid in the regular course was owing to the fact that claimant failed to present its bill before the lapse of the appropriation out of which it could have been paid. It further appears that the department that got the articles recommend the payment of the same.

Therefore an award is allowed claimant in the sum of $75.79.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.