Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Rendleman v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 571 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1735
Disposition: (No. 1735-Claimant awarded $500.81.) Award: $500.81 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Rendleman v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 571 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Rendleman v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 571 1931-05-14 (No. 1735-Claimant awarded $500.81.) /opinions/v06-p0600-1/

WILLIS RENDLEMAN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for digging a well at Giant City State Park. The court awarded $500.81 based on the recommendation of the Director of Public Works and Buildings and no objection from the Attorney General.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

This is a claim brought to recover the cost of digging a well on a tract of land in Jackson County, known as Giant City State Park owned by the State of Illinois. It appears from the evidence herein that a letter written by H. H. Cleaveland, Director of the Department of Public Works and Buildings discloses that the well is very satisfactory, giving an abundant supply of good drinking water and is being used continuously by the visitors to Giant City Park. That the bill for this work is based on the price as charged the State in the digging of a second well and that in justice to the claimant the bill should be paid. [*332]

The bill is in the sum of $500.81 and on the recommendation of Director Cleveland and no objections being made by the Attorney General, this court recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of $500.81.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.