Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Robert E. Lee v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 570 Illinois Court of Claims Filed May 14, 1931 No. 1730
Disposition: (No. 1730-Claimant awarded $2,775.00.) Award: $2,775.00
Cite as: Robert E. Lee v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 570 (1931)
Line of Duty Compensation 6 awarded 1930s Robert E. Lee v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 570 May 14, 1931 (No. 1730-Claimant awarded $2,775.00.) /opinions/v06-p0599-1/

ROBERT E. LEE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a state employee, was injured while working on a highway paving machine, resulting in the loss of four fingers. The Attorney General admitted liability, and the court awarded $2,775.00 under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Claim type: Line Of Duty Death

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made-Workmen's Compensation OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE- FEES AND SALARIES-when claimant entitled to additional salary. Where

The claimant while working on State Highway Route 25 near Flora, Illinois, as an employee of the State of Illinois and while in line of duty as such employee it became necessary to put a spring in a batchmixer of the paving machine and while doing so the claimant slipped and his right hand caught in a bucket operating gears of a revolving drum. As the result his hand was badly crushed and mangled. As a result of the accident it became necessary to remove all four fingers of his right hand and also a part of the hand itself.

The Attorney General comes and defends and admits that claimant is entitled to recover Twenty-seven Hundred Seventy-five ($2,775.00) Dollars, according to the statutes in force at the time of the accident.

The court is of the opinion that this is reasonable, and measured by the Workmen's Compensation Act. Therefore this court recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of Twenty-seven Hundred Seventy-five ($2,775.00) Dollars.

(Claims allowed.)

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.