Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Cochran v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 568 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1721
Disposition: (No. 1721-Claimant awarded $3,750.00.) Award: $3,750.00 Agency: State Penitentiary at Joliet
Cite as: Cochran v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 568 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Cochran v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 568 1931-05-14 (No. 1721-Claimant awarded $3,750.00.) /opinions/v06-p0597-2/

ANN E. COCHRAN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, widow of Fowler I. Cochran, sought compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act for her husband's death from injuries sustained when his jacket caught in machinery at the Joliet penitentiary. The court awarded $3,750.00.

Claim type: Wrongful Death

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY.-when award will be made-Workmen's Compensation OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

The claimant is the wife of Fowler I. Cochran, who was employed by the State of Illinois in the capacity of a machine [*599] shop foreman in the State Penitentiary at Joliet and so engaged on the 14th day of February, A. D. 1930, the jacket he was wearing became accidently caught in a set screw on one of the machines in said shop, and he was dragged thereby into such machinery, thereby receiving serious injuries to his face, head and body and as a result of which he afterwards on November 20, A. D. 1930 died.

The work he was so doing is hazardous and comes within the Workmen's Compensation Act. The claimant is entitled under the Workmen's Compensation Act to the sum of $3,750.00.

We therefore award the claimant the sum of Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty ($3,750.00) Dollars.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.