Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Walker v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 560 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1685
Disposition: (No. 1685-Claimant awarded $642.30.) Award: $642.30 Agency: Division of Highways
Cite as: Walker v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 560 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Walker v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 560 1931-05-14 (No. 1685-Claimant awarded $642.30.) /opinions/v06-p0589-1/

FAY WALKER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a highway maintenance assistant, suffered a fractured wrist when a truck crank backfired. The court awarded $642.30 in compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made-Workmen's Compensation

[*561] The claimant was employed as an assistant to the Maintenance Patrolman in District No. 5, Division of Highways.

His duties were to drive a truck, haul cinders, cement and other building materials and to assist with general maintenance work. On or about July 25th, 1930, while so employed claimant attempted to crank a large highway truck when the motor backfired causing the crank to strike claimant's arm breaking his wrist and throwing him to the ground.

The bones of his right forearm were fractured and dislocated.

The evidence shows that claimant was temporarily disabled for a period of approximately fourteen weeks and that he has suffered permanent disability of approximately 20 per cent.

The Attorney General comes and defends and recommends that if this court finds the claimant operated under the Workmen's Compensation Act that claimant be allowed a compensation of $642.30.

Therefore it is recommended that claimant be awarded the sum of $642.30.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.