Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Knowles v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 534 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1687
Disposition: (No. 1687-Claimant awarded $2,607.05.) Award: $2,607.05 Agency: University of Illinois
Cite as: Knowles v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 534 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Knowles v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 534 1931-05-14 (No. 1687-Claimant awarded $2,607.05.) /opinions/v06-p0563-1/

JOSEPH M. KNOWLES, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a worker at the University of Illinois, was injured when a crate slipped and struck him in the abdomen. The court found liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act and awarded $2,607.05.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made-Workmen's Compensation

It appears that claimant was working for the University of Illinois through the summer of 1926. It appears further that the claimant was moving large crates from one room to another of the canning factory connected with the university. [*535]

It appears that a crate slipped off and struck Mr. Knowles in the abdomen causing quite considerable injury to bladder.

The Attorney General comes and defends and sets up that claimant under the Workmen's Compensation Law in event there was a liability, would be entitled on account of temporary total disability, medical bills and hospital expenses the sum of $2,607.05.

The court is of the opinion that there is a liability as measured by the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Therefore the court recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of $2,607.05.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.