Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Scrivner v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 521 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1603
Disposition: (No. 1603-Claim denied.) Agency: Peoria State Hospital
Cite as: Scrivner v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 521 (1931)
Legacy General 6 denied 1930s Scrivner v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 521 1931-05-14 (No. 1603-Claim denied.) /opinions/v06-p0550-1/

MARTHA SCRIVNER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $5,000 for a hernia allegedly caused by lifting a drawer while working as an assistant cook at Peoria State Hospital. The court denied the claim, holding that the State is immune from tort liability when exercising governmental functions and that the Workmen's Compensation Act does not apply because operating a hospital is not an extra-hazardous enterprise under the Act.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Cases cited: Village of Chapin v. Industrial Com., 336 Ill. 461; Perry v. State, 6 Ct. Cl. No. 1246

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when State not liable-governmental function. In WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-when applicable to the State-conduct-

Claimant was employed as an assistant cook at the Peoria State Hospital. On December 7, 1928, while engaged in her work, she lifted a meat table drawer weighing about 25 or 30 pounds. She alleges lifting the drawer caused her to suffer a rupture of the lower portion of her abdomen, and has filed this claim for $5,000.00 damages.

In conducting penal, charitable and educational institutions the State is in the exercise of its governmental functions and is not liable for injuries received by its employees therein, in the absence of a statute creating such liability. [*522]

Claimant contends, however, in her brief that her case comes within the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act. The Workmen's Compensation Act applies to the State only when the State is engaged in a business declared to be extra hazardous by Section 3 of that Act. (Village of Chapin v. Industrial Com., 336 Ill. 461; Perry v. State, 6 Ct. Cl. No. 1246.) Conducting a hospital does not come within any of the enterprises declared extra hazardous by that section.

The claim is therefore denied and the case dismissed.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.